The Zemi Method, Version 1.1
The current method text: principles, lifecycle, classifications, reporting requirements, and defensibility check.
An evidentiary methodology for investigation and assurance.
The Zemi Method is a published, versioned evidentiary methodology governing digital forensic investigation and AI assurance. Its premise is that every claim relevant to a decision, including claims produced by an organization's own systems, is a hypothesis until evidence from an independent source supports it.
The method defines five governing principles, a six-phase investigative lifecycle with a mandatory human adjudication gate, a categorical classification of findings as known, assumed, or undetermined, and a standing defensibility check.
Version note: Version 1.1 is a pressure-test-driven author revision. It is not peer reviewed or empirically validated. External review and engagement-based validation remain open.
The current method text: principles, lifecycle, classifications, reporting requirements, and defensibility check.
The literature, lineage, limits, and positioning companion for understanding what the method claims and does not claim.
A synthetic example showing how the method handles authority, scope, evidence limits, classification, and reporting.
SHA-256 hashes are maintained separately so the homepage stays readable while the integrity record remains available.
The Version 1.1 Zenodo record will be added after deposit. Earlier records remain available for provenance.
Earlier versions remain available for comparison and provenance, but the current package above is the recommended reading path.
Watson, K. V. (2026). The Zemi Method: An Evidentiary Methodology for Investigation and Assurance, Version 1.1. DOI pending Zenodo deposit.